Non-ferrous metal of the Bronze Age of Northern Kazakhstan: geochemical characteristics and ore base
Artemyev D.A., Degtyareva A.D., Kuzminykh S.V., Orlovskaya L.B.
VESTNIK ARHEOLOGII ANTROPOLOGII I ETNOGRAFII ¹ 1 (64) (2024)
https://doi.org/10.20874/2071-0437-2024-64-1-2
page 19–37
(Download)
Abstract
The chemical composition of 29 copper and bronze artifacts from the sites of the Petrovka and Alakul Cultures located between the Tobol and Ishim Rivers (the burial grounds of Bekteniz and Dzhangildy 5, and the sites of Novonikolskoye 1 and Semiozernoye 2; Northern Kazakhstan) were analysed using mass spectrometry with inductively coupled plasma and laser ablation. The sites are 14C dated to the interval between the 19th–17th centuries BC. In the examined sample, the leading metallurgical group with a slight prevalence in both Petrovka and Alakul metals was “pure” copper; the second part of the metal was represented by tin bronzes — low-alloyed (up to 8 wt.% Sn) in the Petrovka, and high-alloyed (Sn up to 21 wt.%) in the Alakul Culture. The statistical analysis of the main components of trace elements in the metal demonstrated a division into six main geochemical groups. Among these, tin bronzes with an uninterpretable copper component (10 specimens), “pure” copper of Ural origin with Fe-Co-Ni-As-Zn correlations (9 specimens), and “pure” copper with polymetallic Sn-Pb-As-Ag-Se specialization (10 copies), corresponding to the ores of copper deposits of the Kokshetau anticlinorium, can be identified. An overview of the tectonic structures of Northern Kazakhstan shows the nearby presence of several porphyry copper and skarn deposits with ancient mines (Imantau, Baksinskoye, Akkan-Burlukskoye, etc.), which likely served as sources of copper ore. Closely associated with these are Greisen and quartz-veingreisen tin deposits, but there is no reliable information about their use in ancient times. According to the composition of tin alloys in the analysed metal, two main types can be distinguished: tin (without correlation with other impurity elements) when using pure cassiterite, and tin-lead (with increased concentrations and correlation of As, Au, Bi, etc.) when using cassiterite-sulfide ores. The data show the association of the Bronze Age sites of Northern Kazakhstan with the ore and raw materials base in this region, and the intensity of trade exchange of metallurgical products between the Ural and Kazakhstan centers of metal production.
Keywords: Northern Kazakhstan, metal production, Petrovka Culture, Alakul Culture, mass spectrometric analysis, geochemical groups, ancient mines.
Funding. The research was supported by the Russian Science Foundation grant No. 23-18-00146 “Non-ferrous metallurgy and metalworking of North-West Asia in the first half of the 2nd millennium BC. (raw materials, technologies, products, trade and communications)”, https://rscf.ru/project/23-18-00146/.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Accepted: 18.12.2023
Article is published: 15.03.2024
Artemyev D.A., SUSC MEG UbRAS, ter. Ilmensky
State Reserve, Miass, 456317, Russian Federation, E-mail:
artemyev@mineralogy.ru,
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1813-8932
Degtyareva A.D., Tyumen Scientific Centre of
Siberian Branch RAS, Chervishevskiy tract st., 13, Tyumen, 625008, Russian
Federation, E-mail:
adegtyareva126@gmail.com,
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1945-7145
Kuzminykh S.V., Institute of Archeology RAS, Dm. Ulyanova st., 19, Moscow, 117292, Russian Federation, E-mail: kuzminykhsv@yandex.ru, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3926-2185
Orlovskaya L.B., Institute of Archeology RAS, Dm. Ulyanova st., 19, Moscow, 117292, Russian Federation, E-mail: lborl47@rambler.ru, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2449-4098