Digital surface models of the Bronze Age fortified settlements of the Southern Trans-Urals (Alandskoye, Arkaim, Verkhneuralskoye, Zarechnoye IV, Sarym-Sakly, Sintashta)

Soldatkin N.V., Molchanov I.V., Sidorin V.M.

VESTNIK ARHEOLOGII ANTROPOLOGII I ETNOGRAFII   ¹ 1 (68)  (2025)

https://doi.org/10.20874/2071-0437-2025-69-2-2

 

              page 1727

(Download)

 

Abstract

Here we present the results of program aerial photography in areas of six fortified settlements of the Southern Trans-Urals (end of the 3rd — first quarter of the 2nd millennium BC; Sintashta and Petrovka archaeological cultures). The results are represented by digital surface models (DSM). They were created on the basis of serial photographs taken automatically from unmanned aerial vehicles. Models were built and processed using “Agisoft Metashape Professional” and “Golden Software Surfer” software packages. DSM act as a source for analyzing and clarifying the configurations of the fortified settlements, which is especially important for new and little-studied sites, such as Verkhneuralskoye and Zarechnoye IV. Also, the aerial photography coverage of a wide area allows clear reflection of the features of the landscape location of the settlements (Arkaim, Sarym-Sakly). By means of digital models, it is possible to record the effects of negative natural and anthropogenic factors on the archaeological sites (Alandskoye). The results of aerial surveys can be the basis for the creation of cartographic materials (Sintashta archaeological complex). The comparison of the DSM with data from other methods allows us to conclude that there is insufficient validity for identifying “additional” elements, such as additional rows of buildings, complex hydraulic structures, extensive structures of unclear purpose, work and utility buildings, on the territory of several sites based solely on the interpretation of individual aerial photographs.

Keywords: Southern Trans-Urals, Bronze Age, Sintashta Culture, Petrovka Culture, Sintashta-Petrovka type fortified settlements, aerial photography, digital surface model.

 

Acknowledgments. The authors express their gratitude to the staff of the Central Administration of the Ministry of Emergency Situations of Russia in the Chelyabinsk Region for their assistance in organizing and conducting aerial photography.

Funding. The work was carried out within the framework of the budget topics of the Institute of History and Archaeology of the Ural Branch of the RAS, No. 124032100048-9 (Soldatkin N.V.) and No. 124032100052-6 (Molchanov I.V.).

 

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Accepted: 26.02.2025

Article is published: 15.06.2025

 

Soldatkin N.V., Institute of History and Archeology of the Ural Branch RAS, S. Kovalevskoy st., 16, Ekaterinburg, 620108, Russian Federation, E-mail: niksoldatkin@yandex.ru, https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5873-1883
 

Molchanov I.V., Institute of History and Archeology of the Ural Branch RAS, S. Kovalevskoy st., 16, Ekaterinburg, 620108, Russian Federation, E-mail: kolis@mail.ru, https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5668-6310

 

Sidorin V.M., Chelyabinsk State historical and archaeological museum-reserve “Arkaim”, Krasnoarmeyskaya st., 100, Chelyabinsk, 454090, Russian Federation, E-mail: arkaimarhiv@yandex.ru, https://orcid.org/0009-0004-3648-7997