VESTNIK ARHEOLOGII ANTROPOLOGII I ETNOGRAFII  

 ¹ 1 (72)  (2026)

page 15–24                                                                                                                                                                                        RUS

https://doi.org/10.20874/2071-0437-2026-72-1-2 

ÓÄÊ 903.01

  http://www.ipdn.ru/_private/a72/15-24.pdf

Esen-2 flint-working workshop in the light of new technical and typological research      

Madreymov, Berik J.,

PhD., Karakalpak State University named after Berdakh, Nukus, Republic of Uzbekistan,
e-mail:
bmadreymov@inbox.ru, https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5725-6363

Abstract

This article analyzes new technical and typological studies of artifacts recovered from the Esen-2 flint-working workshop, located on the southwestern outskirts of the Barsa-Kelmes depression within the Ustyurt plateau. The site was first discovered and investigated by V.A. Vinogradov and E. Bijanov in 1977, yielding a collection of approximately 200 stone artifacts. However, disagreements persist among researchers regarding the cultural and chronological attribution of these materials. Notably, the original investigators proposed divergent interpretations. In particular, E. Bijanov dated the site to the Late Acheulean or Early Mousterian, and A.V. Vinogradov assigned the assemblage to the late Middle or early Late Paleolithic. Furthermore, the authors differed in their interpretation of the bifaces the predominant stone artifacts found at the workshop classifying them either as biface-points or handaxes. Additionally, no consensus has been reached concerning the functional significance of the site. Given the advancements in modern research methods, the present study primarily aims to conduct a technical and typological examination of the Esen-2 materials, resolving, to the extent possible, the aforementioned interpretive discrepancies. The analysis has led to the following key conclusions: 1. The site reflects the existence of two distinct technical traditions. 2. From a cultural and chronological perspective, the Esen-2 materials can be attributed to the parallel-Levallois complex of the early Late Paleolithic, as supported by the presence of flattened bifaces and bladelets processed using an organic chipper. 3. Functionally, the Åsen-2 site is the earliest known specialized workshop for the biface production in the Aral-Caspian region (Ustyurt Plateau).

Keywords: Ustyurt, workshop, Esen-2, blade, biface, scraper, technical chip, patina, Barsa-Kelmes, Levallois, flake, hammer.

© Madreymov B.J., 2026 

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

 Received 28.03.2025

 Accepted 20.11.2025

Article is published: 15.03.2026

   

 

References

Alpisbaev, H.À. (1959). Finds of the Lower Paleolithic in Southern Kazakhstan. Trudy Instituta arheologii i étnografii AN Kazahskoj SSR. T. 7. Alma-Ata: Nauka KazSSR. (Rus.).

Alpysbaev, H.À. (1960). Discovery of the Lower Paleolithic in Kazakhstan. Vestnik Akademii nauk Kazahskoy SSR, (5). (Rus.).

Baratov, P., Mamatkulov, M., Rafikov, A. (2002). Natural geography of Central Asia. Tashkent: Teacher. (Uzb.).

Bijanov, E.B. (1979). Finds of Paleolithic monuments in southeastern Ustyurt. Vestnik KFAN Uzbekskoy SSR, (3), 6877. (Rus.).

Bijanov, E. B. (1988). Paleolithic of Ustyurt (some research problems). Vestnik KFAN Uzbekskoy SSR, (1). (Rus.).

Madreymov, B.J. (2024). The Karakuduk flint-working workshop in light of new technical and typological research. Rossiyskaya arkheologia, (3), 7–20. (Rus.).

Madreymov, B.J. (2022). Paleolithic stone-processing workshops of Ustyurt: (New data about the Esen-2 workshop). In: Arkheologicheskiye kul'tury Sibiri v kontekste kross-kul'turnykh kontaktov v Yevrazii: k 300-letiyu pervykh nauchnykh arkheologicheskikh raskopok v Sibiri (1722 g.): Materialy mezhdunarodnoy nauchnoy konferentsii. Novosibirsk, 116–124. (Rus.).

Medoev, À.G. (1970). Areas of Paleolithic cultures of Sary-Arka. In: Po sledam drevnikh kul'tur Kazakhstana. Alma-Ata: Nauka. (Rus.).

Sayfullaev, B.K. (2022). Middle Zarafshan Oasis Stone Age Cultures (based on the Zirabulok site materials), Samarkand: SamSU Publishing House. (Uzb.).

Pelegrin, J. (1982). Approche technologique expérimentale de la mise rn forme de nucléus pour le débitage sistématique par pression. In: préhistoire de la pierre taille. Vol. 2. Economie de débitage laminaire: technologie et éxperimentation. III-e table ronde de technologie lithique. Meudon-Belleue, Paris, 105116.

Pelegrin, J. (1991). Sur une recherchev technique experimentale des techniques de debitage laminaire et quelques resultats. In: Archeologique experimental. T. 2: La terre. L'os et la pierre; la maison et les champs: Actes du Colloque International Experimentation en archeologie: bilan et perspectives (Acrcheodrome de Beaune; 69 avril 1988). Paris.

Pelegrin, J., Tixier, J.-P. (2004). Les techniques de taille de la pierre préhistorique. Dossiers d'Archéologie, 290, 421.

Vinogradov, À.V. (1981). Ancient hunters and fishermen of the Central Asian interfluve. Moscow: Nauka. (Rus.).

Vinogradov, À.V., Bijanov, Å.B. (1978). The first Paleolithic finds from south-eastern Ustyurt. Arheologicheskie otkrytiya 1977 goda. Moscow. (Rus.).

Vishnyatskiy, L.B. (1996). Paleolithic of Central Asia and Kazakhstan. St. Petersburg: Yevropeiskiy dom. (Rus.).

Vishnyatskiy, L.B., Khamrakuliev, S. (1986). Stone Age workshops in the Yangadji district. Izvestiya AN TSSR. Seriya obshchestvennykh nauk, (2). (Rus.).